Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / PATRICK E. RUDD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 03-1688, February 24, 2004

PATRICK E. RUDD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 03-1688, February 24, 2004

24.06.2008  

PATRICK E. RUDD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 03-1688

February 24, 2004

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Before

Lynch, Lipez and Howard,

Circuit Judges .

Patrick Edwin Rudd on brief pro se.

Robert L. Baker , Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Frank P. Cihlar , Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, and Eileen J. O'Connor , Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

__________________

February 24, 2004

__________________

Per Curiam . Patrick E. Rudd has appealed an order of the United States Tax Court that dismissed his petition, purportedly filed pursuant to 26 U.S.C. ╖ 6330(d), for lack of jurisdiction. We review, de novo, legal interpretations of the Tax Court, such as this jurisdictional determination. See Capitol Video Corp. v. Comm'r , 311 F.3d 458, 463 (1st Cir. 2002). We affirm .

We conclude that the Tax Court correctly ruled that its jurisdiction under ╖ 6330 (d) depends upon the issuance of a valid notice of determination by the IRS's Office of Appeals and the filing of a timely petition for review. This jurisdictional ruling is in accord with the statutory language of ╖ 6330(d) and is consistent with prior tax court rulings and the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. See, e.g. , Moorhous v. Comm'r , 116 T.C. 263, 269 (2001); Rule 330 (b). Rudd makes no cogent opposing argument. Because the respondent Commissioner has not issued any notice of determination with respect to Rudd's tax liability for 1989, the Tax Court correctly dismissed Rudd's petition for lack of jurisdiction.

The order of dismissal is affirmed .

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Почему в суд выгодно представлять именно электронные документы?

Право и возможность подачи электронных документов в суд предоставлено в России давно. Однако по старинке стороны ходят на заседания с большими папками бумажных документов вместо планшетов или ноутбуков. Почему?

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24