Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / HOI THI HUYNH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION, T.C. Memo. 2008-27, Docket No. 22381-06., Filed February 12, 2008

HOI THI HUYNH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION, T.C. Memo. 2008-27, Docket No. 22381-06., Filed February 12, 2008

24.06.2008  

HOI THI HUYNH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION

T.C. Memo. 2008-27

Docket No. 22381-06.

Filed February 12, 2008.

Hoi Thi Huynh, pro se.

Tracy Hogan , for respondent.

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FOLEY, Judge : The issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable for a section 72(t) 1 10-percent additional tax relating to distributions from a qualified retirement plan.

***********

1 ═ Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

***********

FINDINGS OF FACT

Until October 2003, petitioner was employed as a math teacher with the City of Chicago. While employed as a teacher, petitioner acquired an annuity account with AXA Equitable, a qualified retirement plan. In 2004, petitioner received distributions from AXA Equitable of $5,478 and $8,961. Petitioner reported, on her 2004 tax return, the distributions as income from pensions and annuities.

On July 31, 2006, respondent issued petitioner a notice of deficiency relating to 2004 and determined that petitioner was liable for a 10-percent additional tax with respect to the distributions.

Petitioner filed her petition with the Court on November 2, 2006, while residing in Chicago, Illinois.

OPINION

A 10-percent additional tax is imposed upon distributions from a qualified retirement plan, unless one of the exceptions enumerated in section 72(t)(2) is satisfied. Sec. 71(t)(1) and (2); see also Dwyer v. Commissioner , 106 T.C. 337 (1996). Petitioner failed to meet any of those exceptions. Accordingly, we sustain respondent's determination.

Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or ═ meritless.

Decision will be entered for respondent.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24
Легкая судьба электронных документов в суде

Бухгалтерские документы отражают важную информацию о хозяйственной деятельности организации.