Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / MARTHA L. JACOBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═, No. 07-1359 ═, Decided: July 27, 2007

MARTHA L. JACOBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═, No. 07-1359 ═, Decided: July 27, 2007

24.06.2008  

MARTHA L. JACOBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═

No. 07-1359 ═

Decided: July 27, 2007

UNPUBLISHED ═

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-00599-TLW) ═

Submitted: July 24, 2007 - Decided: July 27, 2007 ═

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. ═

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ═

Martha L. Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Nolet, Thomas J. Clark, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ═

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. ═

PER CURIAM: ═

Martha L. Jacobs appeals from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint in which she requested that the district court enjoin the Internal Revenue Service from continuing its efforts to collect on a tax liability she disputes and from harassing her. She also sought monetary damages. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jacobs v. IRS , No. 4:06-cv-00599-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ═

AFFIRMED

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Почему в суд выгодно представлять именно электронные документы?

Право и возможность подачи электронных документов в суд предоставлено в России давно. Однако по старинке стороны ходят на заседания с большими папками бумажных документов вместо планшетов или ноутбуков. Почему?

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24