Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / Van Roekel Farms, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 03-4041, June 29, 2004

Van Roekel Farms, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 03-4041, June 29, 2004

24.06.2008  

Van Roekel Farms, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4041

June 29, 2004

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Submitted: June 17, 2004

Filed: June 29, 2004

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Van Roekel Farms, Inc. (Taxpayer) appeals the Tax Court's * order on summary judgment upholding the Internal Revenue Service Commissioner's (Commissioner's) determinations of income tax deficiencies, see 26 U.S.C. ╖ 404(k), and penalties, see 26 U.S.C. ╖ 6662(a). We conclude no issue of material fact existed as to the Commissioner's determination of income tax deficiencies and resulting penalties because the parties stipulated that Taxpayer's employment stock option plan was disqualified under 26 U.S.C. ╖ 401(a) for the tax years 1994-96, and the stipulation was binding on Taxpayer. See Tax Ct. R. 91(e); Clendenen v. Comm'r , 345 F.3d 568, 569-70 (8th Cir. 2003). We also conclude the tax court properly denied all other claims or arguments because Taxpayer neither raised them in its petition nor moved to amend. See Tax Ct. R. 34(b)(4), Brumley v. Comm'r , 76 T.C.M. (CCH) 935, 937 (1998).

*************

* ═ The Honorable James S. Halpern, United States Tax Court Judge.

*************

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the tax court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Эстонская история, или Когда Россия перейдет на электронные паспорта

Минкомсвязь разрабатывает очередной законопроект о едином ID-документе гражданина РФ. И хотя инициативу еще не представили, ее уже поддержали 60% россиян. Но готовы ли чиновники, их инфраструктура и сами граждане к таким переменам? Подробности и мнения экспертов ИТ-отрасли – далее.

Куда дует ветер перемен?

Проект Постановления № 272 ворвался на рынок грузоперевозок