Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / Justyn J. Kozikowski, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 07-1281, Filed: November 15, 2007

Justyn J. Kozikowski, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 07-1281, Filed: November 15, 2007

24.06.2008  

Justyn J. Kozikowski, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1281

Filed: November 15, 2007

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Submitted: November 7, 2007

Filed: November 15, 2007

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Justyn Kozikowski appeals the tax court's 1 dismissal of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies. Upon de novo review, we agree with the tax court that Kozikowski failed to state a plausible or cognizable claim for relief. See Wilcox v. Comm'r , 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir. 1998) (de novo standard of review); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007) (complaint must plead enough facts to state claim for relief that is plausible); Yuen v. Comm'r , 92 T.C.M. (CCH) 1, 3 (2006) (argument is frivolous where it is "contrary to established law and unsupported by a reasoned, colorable argument for change in the law"); May v. Comm'r , 752 F.2d 1301, 1303-04 & n.3 (8th Cir. 1985) (affirming dismissal for failure to state claim because, even if all of taxpayer's allegations were assumed to be true, petition merely contained conclusory assertions attacking constitutionality of Internal Revenue Code and its applicability to taxpayer, all of which had been rejected).

*********

1 ═ The Honorable Peter J. Panuthos, United States Tax Court Judge.

*********

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Kozikowski's pending motions.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Почему в суд выгодно представлять именно электронные документы?

Право и возможность подачи электронных документов в суд предоставлено в России давно. Однако по старинке стороны ходят на заседания с большими папками бумажных документов вместо планшетов или ноутбуков. Почему?

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24