
Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика / WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL, Petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 98-1620, June 29, 1999
WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL, Petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 98-1620, June 29, 1999
WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL, Petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1620
June 29, 1999
NON PUBLISHED OPINION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION√NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Before ═ Lynch, Circuit Judge , Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lipez, Circuit Judge .
═════ William H. Sundel on brief pro se.
═════ Loretta C. Argrett , Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin and Robert J. Branman , Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.
═════ Per Curiam . ═ We have reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties. ═ We affirm the decision of the United States Tax Court, essentially for the reasons given by the court in its memorandum findings of fact and opinion. ═ Sundel v. Commissioner , 75 T.C.M. 1853 (1998). ═ Any further points raised by petitioner in his brief to this court are without merit.
═════ Affirmed .
Комментарии