Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика / Ronald L. Satterlee, Appellant, v. Internal Revenue Service; United States of America; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellees., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 06-3776, Filed: October 25, 2007
Ronald L. Satterlee, Appellant, v. Internal Revenue Service; United States of America; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellees., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 06-3776, Filed: October 25, 2007
Ronald L. Satterlee, Appellant, v. Internal Revenue Service; United States of America; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-3776
Filed: October 25, 2007
[UNPUBLISHED]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
Submitted: September 25, 2007
Filed: October 25, 2007
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court's 1 dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court's de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. , 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir. 2005) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee's motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates , 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review).
**********
1 ═ The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
**********
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Комментарии