Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика / CHRISTIAN K. SCHNEIDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. ═, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═, No. 07-1477 ═, Decided: December 26, 2007 ═, UNPUBLISHED, Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 9348-06L), Submitted: December 20, 2007 - Decided: December 26, 2007
CHRISTIAN K. SCHNEIDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. ═, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═, No. 07-1477 ═, Decided: December 26, 2007 ═, UNPUBLISHED, Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 9348-06L), Submitted: December 20, 2007 - Decided: December 26, 2007
CHRISTIAN K. SCHNEIDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. ═
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ═
No. 07-1477 ═
Decided: December 26, 2007 ═
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 9348-06L)
Submitted: December 20, 2007 - Decided: December 26, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. ═
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ═
Christian K. Schneider, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Patrick J. Urda, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ═
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. ═
PER CURIAM: ═
Christian K. Schneider appeals the tax court's decisions dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Schneider v. IRS , Tax Ct. No. 9348-06L (U.S. Tax Ct. Oct. 10, 2006 & Mar. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ═
AFFIRMED
Комментарии