Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / ESTATE OF MARY ROPPOLO ARTALL, DECEASED, JASPER ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, BETTY JO ARTALL VOLLENWEIDER, CO-EXECUTOR, AND RALPH ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION, T.C. Memo. 2008-67, Docket No. 18899-05., Filed March 18, 2008

ESTATE OF MARY ROPPOLO ARTALL, DECEASED, JASPER ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, BETTY JO ARTALL VOLLENWEIDER, CO-EXECUTOR, AND RALPH ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION, T.C. Memo. 2008-67, Docket No. 18899-05., Filed March 18, 2008

24.06.2008  

ESTATE OF MARY ROPPOLO ARTALL, DECEASED, JASPER ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, BETTY JO ARTALL VOLLENWEIDER, CO-EXECUTOR, AND RALPH ARTALL, CO-EXECUTOR, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

UNITED STATES TAX COURT - MEMORANDUM DECISION

T.C. Memo. 2008-67

Docket No. 18899-05.

Filed March 18, 2008.

Donald A. Capretz and Lawrence D. Huter , for petitioners.

Lillian D. Brigman , for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HALPERN, Judge : Respondent determined a $247,101 deficiency in Federal estate tax.

All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for November 21, 2001, the date of the death of Mary Roppolo Artall (decedent). All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Some of the facts have been stipulated, and are so found. The stipulation of facts, with accompanying exhibits, is incorporated herein by this reference. Jasper and Ralph Artall resided in Louisiana and Betty Jo Artall Vollenweider resided in Texas at the time the petition was filed.

The sole issue remaining for decision is a question of law that, recently, we answered in Estate of Farnam v. Commissioner , 130 T.C. __ (2008). The question is whether, for purposes of the liquidity test of section 2057(b)(1)(C), decedent's loans to an entity owned by her and two of her children and carrying on a trade or business are to be treated as interests in that entity. In Estate of Farnam we answered that question in the negative. Petitioners have made no arguments that lead us to believe that we erred in Estate of Farnam . We rely on Estate of Farnam and hold accordingly.

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Почему в суд выгодно представлять именно электронные документы?

Право и возможность подачи электронных документов в суд предоставлено в России давно. Однако по старинке стороны ходят на заседания с большими папками бумажных документов вместо планшетов или ноутбуков. Почему?

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24