Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal ═ Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ Acme Leasing Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ ABC Seamless Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. Shirley J. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Nos. 03-3389, 03-3390, 03-3391, 03-3392, May 20, 2004

Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal ═ Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ Acme Leasing Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ ABC Seamless Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. Shirley J. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Nos. 03-3389, 03-3390, 03-3391, 03-3392, May 20, 2004

24.06.2008  

Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal ═ Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ Acme Leasing Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. ═ ABC Seamless Trust, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee. Shirley J. Oyer, Transferee, Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 03-3389, 03-3390, 03-3391, 03-3392

May 20, 2004

Unpublished Opinion

Appeals from the United States Tax Court.

[UNPUBLISHED]

Submitted: April 16, 2004

Filed: May 20, 2004

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MAGILL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the Tax Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service in taxpayers' suit challenging the IRS's determination that they were liable as transferees for taxes in the amount of approximately $90,000. The Tax Court held, inter alia , that the doctrine of res judicata barred taxpayers from contesting the amount owed because the court had previously entered stipulated decisions against taxpayers that determined the taxes that are the subject of the dispute here.

We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the Tax Court correctly applied the doctrine of res judicata in this case. We therefore affirm on the basis of its well-reasoned decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Легкая судьба электронных документов в суде

Бухгалтерские документы отражают важную информацию о хозяйственной деятельности организации.

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Как открыть для себя «Личный кабинет налогоплательщика»?

Если у вас нет еще доступа в ваш «Личный кабинет», то советую сделать