Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / Alan Robert Zinsmeister, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 01-2333, October 30, 2001

Alan Robert Zinsmeister, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent., United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, No. 01-2333, October 30, 2001

24.06.2008  

Alan Robert Zinsmeister, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2333

October 30, 2001

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Submitted: October 22, 2001

Filed: October 30, 2001

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed a portion of the alimony deductions Alan Zinsmeister claimed on his 1994, 1995, and 1996 tax returns and assessed deficiencies. Zinsmeister petitioned for redetermination of the deficiencies. The Tax Court 1 upheld a portion of the disallowed deductions but ruled that Zinsmeister could not deduct as alimony certain payments he had been ordered to make under temporary support orders and a divorce decree, namely, one-half of the payments made on the family home for a period when he and his ex-wife were co-owners, all payments on a second mortgage on the home, and fees paid to his exwife's attorney for services during the divorce proceedings. Zinsmeister appeals, arguing that all the payments should be deductible as alimony under ╖ 71(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. After careful review of the record and the contentions made by Zinsmeister on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Tax Court's thorough Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion filed November 30, 2000. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

***************

1 The HONORABLE CAROLYN MILLER PARR, United States Tax Court Judge.

***************

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Саркисов Валерий
Саркисов Валерий

АК «Судебный адвокат»

Освобождение от уголовной ответственности

Какое грозит наказание и как его избежать: алгоритм первоначальных действий

4
Хитров Дмитрий
Хитров Дмитрий

Компания «Электронный арбитраж»

Почему в суд выгодно представлять именно электронные документы?

Право и возможность подачи электронных документов в суд предоставлено в России давно. Однако по старинке стороны ходят на заседания с большими папками бумажных документов вместо планшетов или ноутбуков. Почему?

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Ошибки риэлтора могут помешать получению имущественного вычета

При совершении сделок при покупке или продаже жилья советую быть внимательным при подписании договора купли-продажи. В противном случае покупатель не сможет вернуть НДФЛ в полном размере.

24