Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика / KOMEZ & CHANTHA YIN HANSEN, Petitioners, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 98-1037, July 1, 1998
KOMEZ & CHANTHA YIN HANSEN, Petitioners, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit, No. 98-1037, July 1, 1998
KOMEZ & CHANTHA YIN HANSEN, Petitioners, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1037
July 1, 1998
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT
ON APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT
[HON. MARY ANN COHEN, CHIEF JUDGE]
Before ═ Selya, Circuit Judge , Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lynch, Circuit Judge .
═════ Albert Newell on brief for appellants.
═════
Loretta C. Argrett , Assistant Attorney General, Tamara W. Ashford and Teresa E. McLaughlin , Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.
Per Curiam . ═ Essentially for the reasons stated by the tax court in its order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, appellants' petition properly was dismissed as untimely under 26 U.S.C. ╖ 6213(a). ═ We are not persuaded by appellants' argument that the 1994 notice of deficiency was rescinded.
Affirmed . ═ See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
Комментарии