Логин или email Регистрация Пароль Я забыл пароль


Войти при помощи:

Судебные дела / Зарубежная практика  / In re NORDIC VILLAGE, INC., d/b/a Swiss Haus, Debtor. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Plaintiff√Appellant, Robert E. Martin, Lake Co. Treasurer, Plaintiff, v. NORDIC VILLAGE, INC.; David O. Simon, Trustee, Defendants√Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit., 963 F.2d 118, No. 89-3656., April 27, 1992

In re NORDIC VILLAGE, INC., d/b/a Swiss Haus, Debtor. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Plaintiff√Appellant, Robert E. Martin, Lake Co. Treasurer, Plaintiff, v. NORDIC VILLAGE, INC.; David O. Simon, Trustee, Defendants√Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit., 963 F.2d 118, No. 89-3656., April 27, 1992

25.06.2008  

In re NORDIC VILLAGE, INC., d/b/a Swiss Haus, Debtor. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Plaintiff√Appellant, Robert E. Martin, Lake Co. Treasurer, Plaintiff, v. NORDIC VILLAGE, INC.; David O. Simon, Trustee, Defendants√Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

963 F.2d 118

No. 89-3656.

April 27, 1992.

Argued May 3, 1990.

Decided April 27, 1992.

Appeal from Northern District of Ohio, at Cleveland; Thomas D. Lambros, Chief District Judge.

Charles M. Greene, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., William J. Kopp, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, Gary R. Allen, Acting Chief (briefed), Murray S. Horwitz, Gary D. Gray (argued and briefed), John A. Dudeck, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Appellate Section, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff√appellant.

David O. Simon, Law Offices of David O. Smith, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant√appellee.

Before: KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, WELLFORD, * Senior Circuit Judge, and JOINER, ** Senior District Judge.

************************

* Honorable Harry W. Wellford assumed senior status on January 21, 1991.

** Honorable Charles W. Joiner, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

************************

ORDER

The Supreme Court has reversed the judgment and opinion previously entered in this action in which we affirmed the District Court's judgment that the United States had waived its sovereign immunity with respect to the trustee's claim. That Court has now held that the United States did not waive its sovereign immunity under section 106(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, the District Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the trustee's claim for monetary relief.

In accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment, ≈ U.S.≈≈, 112 S.Ct. 1011, 117 L.Ed.2d 181 (1992), we now REVERSE the judgment of the District Court.

Разместить:

Вы также можете   зарегистрироваться  и/или  авторизоваться  

   

Легкая судьба электронных документов в суде

Бухгалтерские документы отражают важную информацию о хозяйственной деятельности организации.

Суфиянова Татьяна
Суфиянова Татьяна

Российский налоговый портал

Как открыть для себя «Личный кабинет налогоплательщика»?

Если у вас нет еще доступа в ваш «Личный кабинет», то советую сделать